Skip to content

Real systems. With numbers, not marketing.

One client project, our own systems, published trade articles. Names stay anonymous, the numbers come from the operation.

Two channels, one brand voice.

DACH law firm for personal injury law, May to August 2026. We built the process inside their Microsoft Teams and operated it: drafts against a fixed rule set, approval with one click, publishing through the firm's own channels.

Posts were made entirely by hand, every week anew.

Drafts were produced against a fixed rule set, in one process instead of several separate tools.

There was no clean approval trail.

The lawyers approved with one click; we operated and monitored the process.

19 posts published through the process.

May to August 2026, published automatically through 2 channels.

Figures from the operation, as of 2026-08-29.

What runs on our own systems.

The same engine runs on our own brands: raw product data in, brand-consistent descriptions per market language out, approval before anything goes live. We test what we sell on our own skin first.

What trade editors have published from our work.

Articles from our work, checked and published by trade editors. Every entry links to the original.

Which of these patterns fits your company?

Describe in two sentences where it is stuck today. We will tell you whether we have seen a comparable case.