Content Automation Rarely Fails Because of Text – But Because of Approval
Law firms have a legitimate risk problem:
- tonality,
- claims/statements,
- examples,
- "sounds like advertising".
If approval is too expensive, it gets skipped. If it's too chaotic, it takes forever.
Goal: A review flow that's done in 10 minutes – because clear guardrails exist beforehand.
1) The 10-Minute Review Flow (Copy/Paste)
Input: 1 draft + 1 checklist.
- 60 seconds: Target audience + topic correct?
- 2 minutes: Check claims/promises (no-go)
- 2 minutes: Check examples/terms (no false suggestions)
- 2 minutes: Style/tone (fits the firm?)
- 2 minutes: CTA/next step (neutral, not aggressive)
- 60 seconds: Grant approval + set status
If it takes longer, the person isn't slow – the process is wrong (too many variables, no standards).
2) QA Checklist for Law Firm Content
| Check | Question | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Target audience | Who is it really for? | OK / Adjust |
| Claim | Are there numbers/promises without context? | Remove/Qualify |
| Tone | Does it sound like advertising? | Neutralize |
| Legal proximity | Does it sound like advice? | Clarify ("general") |
| Examples | Are they anonymous/uncritical? | OK / Remove |
| CTA | Does it ask for the right thing? | OK / Rephrase |
3) Guardrails That Make Approval Fast
- Define formats (FAQ, checklist, avoid mistakes, mini-case)
- No-go list (see next article)
- 1 owner (partner/team lead) + backup
- Status model: Draft → Review → Approved → Scheduled → Published
KPI Block
- Approval time per week (target: 10–30 minutes)
- Number of questions/revisions (target: decreasing)
- Publishing frequency (target: predictable, not sporadic)
Next Step
If you want content automation, don't start with "more output", but with approval + QA.