Problem: "The Workflow Runs... Until It Doesn't"
In law firms, automations rarely fail because of the tool – but because of ownership: Nobody feels responsible, alerts go nowhere, changes happen "on the side".
Goal: A minimal but robust role framework that makes operations possible (without a new department).
The Minimal Setup (5 Roles That Suffice)
- Business Owner (Sponsor)
- Decides priorities, accepts scope/ROI.
- Escalation address when SLAs/KPIs break.
- Process Owner (Business)
- Responsible for the process (e.g., intake, follow-ups, document flow).
- Defines status logic, acceptances, exceptions.
- Workflow Owner (Operational)
- Responsible for the specific workflow end-to-end.
- Receives alerts, coordinates fixes, maintains docs/runbook.
- Data Owner (Source/Quality)
- Responsible for data quality at the source (required fields, validation, dedupe rules).
- Decides which data gets processed (minimum principle).
- Backup Owner (Substitute)
- Steps in for vacation/illness.
- Must have access + context (not a "silent name" on a list).
Optional (depending on risk): DPO/Compliance review as gate for PII/sensitive data.
RACI to Copy (1 Workflow)
| Task | Business Owner | Process Owner | Workflow Owner | Data Owner | Backup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set goal/KPI | A | R | C | C | I |
| Define status model | C | A/R | C | C | I |
| Data fields/validation | I | C | C | A/R | I |
| Go-live decision | A | R | R | C | I |
| Handle monitoring/alerts | I | C | A/R | C | R |
| Approve changes | A | R | R | C | I |
| Incident (outage) | I | C | A/R | C | R |
Legend: R=Responsible, A=Accountable, C=Consulted, I=Informed
Escalation Logic (So It Doesn't Get Stuck)
- P1 (critical): Retainer/deadline/payment relevance, data loss, security suspicion
- Response time: ≤ 2h
- Escalation: Workflow Owner → Process Owner → Business Owner
- P2 (high): Process stopped, but workaround possible
- Response time: ≤ 8h
- P3 (normal): Comfort/optimization
- Response time: ≤ 2 business days
Stop rule: If same error occurs 3× in 7 days → plan change/refactor (don't keep "clicking away").
Artifact: Owner Card (1 Page)
Copy and fill out per workflow:
- Workflow: ___
- Goal/KPI: ___
- Process Owner: ___
- Workflow Owner: ___
- Backup: ___
- Data sources: ___
- PII included? (yes/no) ___
- Alerts to: ___
- Runbook link: ___
- Change window (weekday/time): ___
How to Measure "Ownership Works" (KPI Block)
Alert acknowledge time (median): Target e.g., < 60 minutes
MTTR (Median Time To Recovery): Target e.g., < 1 business day (P2)
Repeat error rate: < 10% (errors occurring 2×+)
Guide: AI Automation for Law Firms
Deep dive: Owner & Change Process (Governance)
Deep dive: 30/60/90 Day Plan: 1 Workflow Live
Next Step
If you tell me team size, 1 target KPI, and 2–3 core systems, I can tell you:
- what minimal role model is enough,
- where you have a real risk (PII, ownership, status),
- and which 1st workflow makes the most sense.