Skip to content
fudaut

n8n vs. Zapier for Law Firms: An Honest Comparison

Which automation tool fits law firm requirements better? A practical comparison focusing on data privacy, costs, and scalability.

20 January 2026Updated: 18 February 2026
Quality Note
  • Focus: Process/operations over tool hype
  • As of: 18 February 2026
  • No legal advice – only organisational/process model
  • How we work

Why This Comparison Matters

When law firms think about automation, one question inevitably comes up: Zapier or n8n? Both tools promise to automate repetitive tasks. But the differences are significant—especially for teams handling sensitive data.

This article isn't a marketing pitch for n8n. It's an honest comparison based on real projects with law firms.

Data Privacy: The Biggest Difference

Zapier

  • Cloud-only: All data flows through US servers
  • Subprocessor list: Dozens of third parties with data access
  • GDPR: Possible, but requires Standard Contractual Clauses and risk assessment

n8n

  • Self-hosting available: Data stays on your server (or EU cloud of choice)
  • Full control: You decide what data flows where
  • GDPR/UK GDPR: Much easier to argue when the instance runs in your jurisdiction

Bottom line for law firms: If client data flows through workflows (and it almost always does), self-hosting is a significant advantage.

Costs at Volume

Here's where it gets interesting. Zapier charges per "task"—every action in a workflow costs.

Example: Lead Intake Workflow

A typical intake workflow has 5-8 steps:

  1. Form trigger
  2. Validate data
  3. Write to CRM
  4. Send email
  5. Slack notification
  6. Schedule follow-up

At 50 inquiries/week = 200 inquiries/month:

  • Zapier: 200 × 6 steps = 1,200 tasks/month → from $49/month (Starter), realistically $149/month (Professional)
  • n8n Cloud: €20/month (unlimited executions up to 5 workflows)
  • n8n Self-Hosted: €0 (only server costs, approx. €10-30/month)

Complexity and Flexibility

When Zapier Is Sufficient

  • Simple 3-4 step workflows
  • Standard integrations (Slack → Google Sheets)
  • Team without technical resources for hosting

When n8n Is the Better Choice

  • Workflows with branches and conditions
  • Custom code blocks (JavaScript/Python)
  • Integrations with practice management software without ready-made connectors
  • Workflows that need to grow over years

Conclusion: Context Matters

  • Zapier is good for quick prototypes and small teams without technical resources
  • n8n is better for law firms that want to automate long-term and value data privacy

The decision shouldn't depend on features, but on the question: How important is control over my data?


Considering which tool fits your firm? In an initial consultation, we can figure it out together—no sales pressure.

Related Articles

Based on topic tags. View all topics

KPI Reporting for UK Solicitors: SRA Compliance Metrics + Automation

How UK law firms can automate KPI reporting while meeting SRA Standards for competence, supervision, and client service.

Content Automation for UK Solicitors: SRA Compliance + GDPR Guardrails

How UK law firms can automate content marketing while staying compliant with SRA Standards and UK GDPR requirements.

n8n Automation for UK Solicitors: GDPR and SRA Compliance

How UK law firms can implement workflow automation while staying compliant with GDPR, UK GDPR, and SRA regulations.

Next Step: 1 Workflow in Production (instead of 10 Ideas)

If you give us brief context, we'll come to a clear scope (goal, data, status/owner) in the initial call – no sales show.

  • Team size (approx.)
  • 2–3 systems (e.g., email, CRM, DMS)
  • 1 target KPI (response time, throughput time, routing rate...)
  • Current bottleneck (handoffs, status, data quality)

Newsletter

Practical tips on AI automation and n8n for law firms. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.